Uso y colocación de rejas en la vía pública; efectos en el tránsito vehicular y peatonal (página 2)

Abstract:

The subject of this job is, analyzed from a legal point of
view the use and construction of the gates, and the way they
threaten buildings or contribute to supporting alternative means
as to the rights and needs for the proper and safe coexistence of
all person.

The pervasive sense of fear that we live in today has spawned
a series of demonstrations by citizens: From extreme measures as
To get justice on their own hands is a  popular behavior
until preventive measures such as organizing rounds urban and,
more recently, the widespread use and Installation of metal gates
on public roads.

Obviously that all people and societies in general looking for
a system of governance that ensures a company that offers peace
and prosperity to its people, no one would like to be a victim of
assault or some form of threats and assaults that affect their
welfare. Thus, one of the main ideals behind progress in any
society is to live in harmony, and in a situation of public
security and citizen.

But the problem is not purely regulatory or only relates to
the increase in violence and crime, the main inconvenience caused
by this conflict is the feeling of insecurity, the citizen was
"imprisoned" and because it feels unsafe, their often opts to
build protective railings, in its urbanization, even in their own
homes, because they perceive that there is confidence in the
ability of the government to ensure their security and to
implement justice, bearing in mind that public safety is one of
the primary functions of the state, since it is inconceivable to
a state that does not ensure the security of its citizens

Result natural then that citizenship, intends to take measures
to be translated into active participation in the fight against
crime in the face of these circumstances is that the people
placed, build or construct the gates at the entrances, and routes
of entry estates and residential areas.

 But this also means that the citizenry is split many
times and proceed to solve their problems privately so to speak;
finishes building fences as protection mechanisms, seeking to
meet needs in a particular way. You could say it is "privatized
security", contrary to the "integration" of society. Probably
because although we have common interests and needs, (such as the
public security) we have not yet come to set up a community of
citizens who feel they belong to a society demanding equal
rights. A gate usually not only separates the two neighboring
housing estates but also can cause the disintegration of
these.

 Moreover the spread of disorderly bars, has caused a
problem in trying to regulate their use, has touched off a
controversy, since neither the Constitution nor the Organic Law
of Municipalities explicitly empower local government to adopt
safety measures involving the restriction of the right to free
movement.

While it is true that local governments cannot restrict the
right of free transit, it has the duty to provide public safety,
however, the violation of freedom of movement, which materializes
presumably in bars installed in would result 
unconstitutional and according to article 2, paragraph 11 of the
Constitution, everyone has the right "(…) to choose their place
of residence, to travel through its territory and to leave and
enter it, except limitations due Health, or by court order or by
operation of law on foreigners. "

Often neighbors face a difficult decision, the use of these
buildings represents an alternative to deal with crime. However
the purpose of the construction and use of grills on the public
highway, on the grounds of public safety cannot restrict freedom
of movement, but simply to safeguard the security and tranquility
of citizens.

Another dispute focuses on the effectiveness of the gates as a
protection mechanism, and the perception of the people with
regard to security that these provide. One might ask if these
buildings really provide security to districts that have a
greater number of gates installed? Finally, faced with this
situation, it is first necessary to analyze and conclude whether
or bars infringe on the constitutional right of free transit. The
topic is so broad that are deployed in a number of controversies
that intend to discuss the development of this investigation.

Introducción

Durante el trayecto de mi vida y en relación a mi
entorno social, encontré situaciones que bajo determinadas
circunstancias  vulneran los derechos fundamentales y
necesarios para el normal desarrollo de
toda persona y
progreso integral y equilibrado de toda sociedad.

La elección del presente tema obedece a diferentes
motivos que  a menara de ejemplo, toman forma al verse
vulnerado y restringido el derecho de un particular a transitar
libremente por alguna calle publica, el sujeto se ve impedido de
ejercer este derecho reconocido constitucionalmente, la causa de
este impedimento son edificaciones tales como las rejas, que
impiden la circulación normal de todas las personas.

Este comportamiento
es producto de
diferentes causas entre ellas el sentimiento de inseguridad
existente en la población de nuestra ciudad y nuestro
país. Ahora bien, como planteamiento del
problema en este caso, me he abocado a establecer y buscar,
bajo que marco jurídico es que las personas edifican e
instalan las rejas en determinadas calles que forman parte de la
vía pública y asimismo, demostrar la manera en que
estas edificaciones influyen en el normal transcurso de  la
vida de las personas.

 En síntesis,
de lo anterior se desprende los siguientes problemas:

¿Si  efectivamente existe un marco jurídico
que regule a nivel nacional el uso y edificación de estos
dispositivos?, ¿De qué manera las rejas vulneran el
libre tránsito tanto vehicular como peatonal?,
¿Cuáles son las verdaderas causas que originan este
comportamiento que trata de dividir las calles?

Por lo tanto, desde un punto de vista personal sostengo
que este es un tema de relevancia jurídica y de actualidad
que forma parte de la sociedad en que vivimos, y debido a esto es
que pretendo dar un humilde aporte a fin de solucionar el
problema planteado. 

Arequipa, 2008

"Quienes pueden renunciar a su libertad
esencial para obtener una pequeña seguridad
temporal no merecen ni libertad ni seguridad"

Benjamín Franklin

Agradezco primeramente a Dios por darme todo lo que tengo y lo
que llegaré a tener y  no dejarme caer nunca.

A mis padres y a mi familia por ser
los mejores y estar conmigo incondicionalmente,

Gracias porque sin ellos y sus enseñanzas no
estaría aquí ni sería lo que soy ahora, a
ellos les dedico esta tesis

 A mis profesores y docentes
quienes me guiaron en cada paso de mi vida, y por haberme
transmitido sus conocimientos y sus experiencias
incondicionalmente 

Gracias 

Tesis PARA OPTAR AL TÍTULO PROFESIONAL DE ABOGADO

Autor:

Arturo Alejandro Zea Manrique

UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE SANTA MARÍA

FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS
JURÍDICAS Y POLÍTICAS PROGRAMA
PROFESIONAL DE DERECHO

AREQUIPA PERÚ – 2008